Dungeons and Dragons: D&D Campaign Outsmarts Ancient Red Dragon by Cleverly Complying to His Challenge

Advertisement
  • 01
    How Our Wizard's Mastery of Arcane Technicalities Overcame a Dragon's Challenge M OC Our D&D group has been playing for years, and we love delving into the nitty-gritty of spell mechanics
  • 02
    and rules. This story from our latest campaign is a prime example of how a deep understanding of these mechanics led to an epic moment of malicious compliance. Background: Our party, consisting of myself (a high-level wizard), a cleric, a fighter, and a rogue, was
  • 03
    on a quest to retrieve an ancient artifact from the lair of a powerful and cunning Ancient Red Dragon, known as Pyrothraxis. This dragon, being both intelligent and devious, proposed a challenge: we could take the artifact if we could "entertain" him without resorting to direct combat or obvious
  • 04
    trickery. If we failed or fought him, he promised a fiery demise. The Setup: Knowing the dragon's penchant for riddles and technicalities, I devised a plan hinging on a very specific interpretation of the spell "Evard's Black Tentacles." This 4th-level spell
  • 05
    conjures a mass of tentacles that can restrain and damage creatures within an area. However, the damage only occurs if a creature enters the area or starts its turn there. The key here was the term "restrain," which doesn't inherently imply harm.
  • 06
    The Execution: As we entered the dragon's lair, I initiated the plan. I cast "Evard's Black Tentacles" to cover the area around the dragon, careful not to include the dragon in the spell's initial effect radius, thus avoiding direct aggression. The tentacles writhed menacingly but didn't harm the dragon. They
  • 07
    formed an intricate pattern, almost like a dance, around Pyrothraxis. Simultaneously, our bard began a performance, using his Bardic Inspiration to enhance the visual spectacle, while our rogue used his Sleight of Hand skills, augmented by the bard's performance, to
  • 08
    stealthily navigate the tentacles and retrieve the artifact. The Dragon's Reaction: Pyrothraxis, expecting a direct as It or a simple magical trick, was both amused and intrigued by this display. He realized too late that our actions, while aggressive,
  • 09
    did not directly harm him or violate his conditions. The tentacles' dance, combined with the bard's performance, was indeed "entertaining," but not in a way he anticipated.
  • 10
    The Outcome: With the artifact secured and the challenge technically met, Pyrothraxis, bound by his word, allowed us to leave. He applauded our clever use of arcane semantics, acknowledging that we had found a loophole in his challenge.
  • 11
    TL;DR: In our D&D campaign, we outsmarted an Ancient Red Dragon by using the specific mechanics of "Evard's Black Tentacles" to create a non-v ht, yet aggressive spectacle, entertaining the dragon while retrieving the artifact without direct co at, adhering to his challenge in the most unexpected way.
  • 12
    Clockwork_Kitsune 3 days ago. edited 2 days ago It's weird that your literal first sentence includes we love delving into the nitty-gritty of spell mechanics and rules. Because your whole story is about ignoring exactly that.
  • 13
    It's more like we love delving into the nitty-gritty of ignoring the RAW and implementing our own spell mechanics and rules. You changed like every aspect of Black Tentacles. It is supposed to target a solid square area. It attacks any creature that goes into it, which
  • 14
    should include the rogue. You're supposed to use Dex saving throws to avoid getting grappled by it, not Sleight of Hand. Bardic Inspiration wouldn't affect it because there's no attack or ability check when casting it. Sure, it's a fun story, and rule of cool trumps all, but don't make yourselves out to be paragons of rule lawyering with this as your example.
  • 15
    ColonelCouch. 3 days ago I agree with a lot of this but the Bardic Inspiration could be used on the Dex save while moving through the tentacles, couldn't it? Reply Share 47 7 ↓ ♡
  • 16
    Clockwork_Kitsune · 3 days ago It could! I meant Bardic Inspiration would have no effect on the initial cast of Black Tentacles. The way they describe Bardic Inspiration being used though
  • 17
    Bardic Inspiration to enhance the visual spectacle, while our rogue used his Sleight of Hand skills, augmented by the bard's performance reads like they think one use of it can inspire multiple allies. I'd probably ask for probably a Deception check, maybe Performance, with advantage
  • 18
    from the wizard to keep the dragon distracted since the bard is helping him. That way the rogue can still have the inspiration for navigating the tentacles. 47 7 Reply Share
  • 19
    ColonelCouch. 3 days ago How did you put a 20 foot square around a dragon without including them in it? 31 Reply Share
  • 20
    GuyForgotHis Password 3 days ago Like almost all these D&D stories, it falls apart as soon as someone who actually knows the spell description comes by. Either the DM didn't know or allowed it in the name of "rule of cool." Regardless, this wouldn't have worked playing rules as written. 29 Reply Share
  • 21
    fozzy_de 3 days ago reminds of the time we began a session at a tournament asking questions like "do lightning bolts bounce of walls?" :) Reply Share 9
  • 22
    As soon as we entered the dragon's lair, I cast "Evard's Black Tentacles" to cover the area around the dragon... 91 9

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article